On Tue, 11 Mar 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> The PR116463 r15-3128 change regressed the following testcase at -O0.
> While for -O1+ we can do -fvar-tracking-assignments, for -O0 we don't
> (partly because it is compile time expensive and partly because at -O0
> most of the vars live most of their lifetime in memory slots), so if we
> DCE some statements, it can mean that DW_AT_location for some vars won't
> be available or even it won't be possible to put a breakpoint at some
> particular line in the source.
> We normally perform dce just in the subpasses of
> pass_local_optimization_passes or pass_all_optimizations or
> pass_all_optimizations_g, so don't do that at all for -O0.  So the complex
> change is an exception.  And it was described as a way to help forwprop and
> reassoc, neither applies to -O0.
> 
> This regresses PR119120 again though, I'll post a patch for that momentarily.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

OK.

> 2025-03-11  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR debug/119190
>       * tree-complex.cc (update_complex_assignment, tree_lower_complex):
>       Perform simple dce on dce_worklist only if optimize.
> 
>       * gfortran.dg/guality/pr119190.f90: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/tree-complex.cc.jj    2025-01-02 11:23:34.810261473 +0100
> +++ gcc/tree-complex.cc       2025-03-10 13:18:42.655209216 +0100
> @@ -735,7 +735,8 @@ update_complex_assignment (gimple_stmt_i
>    update_stmt (stmt);
>    if (maybe_clean_or_replace_eh_stmt (old_stmt, stmt))
>      bitmap_set_bit (need_eh_cleanup, gimple_bb (stmt)->index);
> -  bitmap_set_bit (dce_worklist, SSA_NAME_VERSION (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt)));
> +  if (optimize)
> +    bitmap_set_bit (dce_worklist, SSA_NAME_VERSION (gimple_assign_lhs 
> (stmt)));
>  
>    update_complex_components (gsi, gsi_stmt (*gsi), r, i);
>  }
> @@ -1967,7 +1968,8 @@ tree_lower_complex (void)
>    complex_propagate.ssa_propagate ();
>  
>    need_eh_cleanup = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
> -  dce_worklist = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
> +  if (optimize)
> +    dce_worklist = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
>  
>    complex_variable_components = new int_tree_htab_type (10);
>  
> @@ -2014,8 +2016,11 @@ tree_lower_complex (void)
>  
>    gsi_commit_edge_inserts ();
>  
> -  simple_dce_from_worklist (dce_worklist, need_eh_cleanup);
> -  BITMAP_FREE (dce_worklist);
> +  if (optimize)
> +    {
> +      simple_dce_from_worklist (dce_worklist, need_eh_cleanup);
> +      BITMAP_FREE (dce_worklist);
> +    }
>  
>    unsigned todo
>      = gimple_purge_all_dead_eh_edges (need_eh_cleanup) ? TODO_cleanup_cfg : 
> 0;
> --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/guality/pr119190.f90.jj 2025-03-10 
> 13:19:34.375502530 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/guality/pr119190.f90    2025-03-10 
> 13:24:13.394683486 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +! PR debug/119190
> +! { dg-do run }
> +! { dg-options "-g" }
> +
> +program foo
> +  integer :: ia, ib
> +  complex :: ci
> +  ia = 1
> +  ib = 2
> +  ci = cmplx(ia, ib)
> +  print *, ia
> +  print *, ib        ! { dg-final { gdb-test 12 "ci" "(1,2)" } }
> +end program
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to