Am 08.03.25 um 20:29 schrieb Steve Kargl:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:52:06PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
While looking at the code, I also saw that a member of gfc_symbol introduced with my patch should be a bitfield of width 1. OK for trunk?OK (assuming a successful regression test run).
Committed as r15-7909-g90d9cdfa82d9a8d63e35d928e335719a495c79e3
(and I did run a regression-test :-)
Thanks for the review!
Best regards
Thomas
