The recently-approved Standard Library Hardening proposal (P3471R4) gives pop_front and pop_back member functions hardened preconditions, but std::list was missing assertions on them. Our other sequence containers do have assertions on those members.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/bits/stl_list.h (list::pop_front, list::pop_back): Add non-empty assertions. --- Tested x86_64-linux. Since it's a conformance requirement that we diagnose Hardened Preconditions, we should probably have tests that verify these assertions exist, but ... I ... haven't done that. libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_list.h | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_list.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_list.h index f987d8b9d0a..82ccb50ff18 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_list.h +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_list.h @@ -1784,7 +1784,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CXX11 */ void pop_front() _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT - { this->_M_erase(begin()); } + { + __glibcxx_requires_nonempty(); + this->_M_erase(begin()); + } /** * @brief Add data to the end of the %list. @@ -1833,7 +1836,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CXX11 */ void pop_back() _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT - { this->_M_erase(iterator(this->_M_impl._M_node._M_prev)); } + { + __glibcxx_requires_nonempty(); + this->_M_erase(iterator(this->_M_impl._M_node._M_prev)); + } #if __cplusplus >= 201103L /** -- 2.48.1