"James K. Lowden" <jklow...@schemamania.org> writes:

>> Having a minimal harness in GCCs testsuite is critical - I'd expect a
>> gcc/testsuite/gcobol.dg/dg.exp supporting execution tests.  I assume
>> Cobol has a way to exit OK or fatally and this should be
>> distinguished as testsuite PASS or FAIL.  
>
> Yes, a COBOL program exits with a return status.  And we rigged up NIST
> to do that.  What that means requires a long explanation, sorry.  

Regardless of the NIST usage you will need a frame work
of GCC specific COBOL tests. You are expected that for every bug that
you fix that wasn't detected by NIST you add a test case.
Surely you have some of those already?

-Andi

Reply via email to