The existing usage comment for check-function-bodies is presumably a
typo, as it doesn't match existing uses. Fix it.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. I'm going to install it as obvious if there
are no objections in the next 24 hours.
for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
* lib/scanasm.exp (check-function-bodies): Fix usage comment.
---
gcc/testsuite/lib/scanasm.exp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/scanasm.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/scanasm.exp
index beffedd5bce46..97935cb23c3cf 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/scanasm.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/scanasm.exp
@@ -985,7 +985,7 @@ proc check_function_body { functions name body_regexp } {
# Check the implementations of functions against expected output. Used as:
#
-# { dg-do { check-function-bodies PREFIX TERMINATOR[ OPTION[ SELECTOR
[MATCHED]]] } }
+# { dg-final { check-function-bodies PREFIX TERMINATOR[ OPTION[ SELECTOR
[MATCHED]]] } }
#
# See sourcebuild.texi for details.
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive
