Applied to master with the requested change (to XFAIL for ilp32).

Thanks,
Philipp.

On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 12:45, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 12:36 PM Konstantinos Eleftheriou
> <konstantinos.elefther...@vrull.eu> wrote:
> >
> > From: kelefth <konstantinos.elefther...@vrull.eu>
> >
> > The match.pd canonicalization that this testcase checks for,
> > is not applied on ilp32 targets.
> >
> > This prevents the test from running on ilp32 targets.
> >
> >         PR116845
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * gcc.dg/pr109393.c: Exclude ilp32 targets.
> > ---
> >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr109393.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr109393.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr109393.c
> > index b2dd5a0b645..e0c42873c1b 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr109393.c
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr109393.c
> > @@ -20,4 +20,5 @@ int bar(int *a, int j)
> >    return (&a[j + 1] - 2) == &a[k];
> >  }
> >
> > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "return 1;" 3 "optimized" } } */
> > +/* The pattern is not applied on ilp32 targets (PR116845).  */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "return 1;" 3 "optimized" { target
> { ! ilp32 } } } } */
>
> can you instead xfail for ilp32?
>
> OK with that change.
>
> > --
> > 2.47.0
> >
>

Reply via email to