On 1/5/25 3:01 PM, Simon Martin wrote:
We currently fail with a checking assert upon the following valid code
when using -fno-elide-constructors
=== cut here ===
struct d { ~d(); };
d &b();
struct f {
[[__no_unique_address__]] d e;
};
struct h : f {
h() : f{b()} {}
} i;
=== cut here ===
The problem is that split_nonconstant_init_1 detects that it cannot
elide the copy constructor due to __no_unique_address__ but does not
clear TARGET_EXPR_ELIDING_P, and due to -fno-elide-constructors, we trip
on a checking assert in cp_gimplify_expr.
This patch fixes this by making sure that we clear TARGET_EXPR_ELIDING_P
if we determine that we have to keep the copy constructor due to
__no_unique_address__. An alternative would be to just check for
elide_constructors in that assert, but I think it'd lose most of its
value if we did so.
Successfully tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK.
PR c++/118199
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* typeck2.cc (split_nonconstant_init_1): Clear
TARGET_EXPR_ELIDING_P if we need to use a copy constructor
because of __no_unique_address__.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/init/no-elide3.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/typeck2.cc | 5 +++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/no-elide3.C | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/no-elide3.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck2.cc b/gcc/cp/typeck2.cc
index 381f198d0fe..f50c5f767bb 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck2.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck2.cc
@@ -655,6 +655,11 @@ split_nonconstant_init_1 (tree dest, tree init, bool last,
&& make_safe_copy_elision (sub, value))
goto build_init;
+ if (TREE_CODE (value) == TARGET_EXPR)
+ /* We have to add this constructor, so we will not
+ elide. */
+ TARGET_EXPR_ELIDING_P (value) = false;
+
tree name = (DECL_FIELD_IS_BASE (field_index)
? base_ctor_identifier
: complete_ctor_identifier);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/no-elide3.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/no-elide3.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..659eb19bc95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/no-elide3.C
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR c++/118199
+// { dg-do "compile" { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-fno-elide-constructors" }
+
+struct d { ~d(); };
+d &b();
+struct f {
+ [[__no_unique_address__]] d e;
+};
+struct h : f {
+ h() : f{b()} {}
+} i;