On Tue, 21 Jan 2025, Martin Uecker wrote:
> The bigger issue seems that if you forward reference a member, you
> do not yet know its type. So whatever syntax we pick, general expressions
> seem problematic anyway:
>
> struct {
> char *buf [[counted_by(2 * .n + 3)]];
> unsigned int n;That's why N3188 would require such a not-yet-declared member to have type const size_t. -- Joseph S. Myers josmy...@redhat.com
