On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 15:12 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote: > > to handle the "const << reg" case. Or would it be better to make the > > lshift_cheap_p try out more shifty things? > > The simpler lshift_cheap stays, the better. It's already warty to have > to look at rtx_cost in a GIMPLE pass.
OK, correction in the target code it'll be then :) Cheers, Oleg
