ping?
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 at 23:53, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Commit r15-6389-g670df03e5294a3 only partially fixed support for moves > of large modes: despite the introduction of V2x* and V4x* modes in > r15-6245-g4f4e13dd235b to support MVE tuples, we still need to support > TI, OI and XI modes, which appear for instance in gcc.dg/pr100887.c. > > The problem was noticed when running the testsuite with > -mthumb/-march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp+fp.dp/-mtune=cortex-m55/-mfloat-abi=hard/-mfpu=auto > where several tests would ICE in output_move_neon. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > PR target/118131 > * config/arm/arm.h (VALID_MVE_STRUCT_MODE): Accept TI, OI and XI > modes again. > --- > gcc/config/arm/arm.h | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h > index b2044db938b..4246b34b6e0 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h > +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h > @@ -1128,7 +1128,10 @@ extern const int arm_arch_cde_coproc_bits[]; > || (MODE) == CImode || (MODE) == XImode) > > #define VALID_MVE_STRUCT_MODE(MODE) \ > - ((MODE) == V2x16QImode \ > + ((MODE) == TImode \ > + || (MODE) == OImode \ > + || (MODE) == XImode \ > + || (MODE) == V2x16QImode \ > || (MODE) == V2x8HImode \ > || (MODE) == V2x4SImode \ > || (MODE) == V2x8HFmode \ > -- > 2.34.1 >