On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:25:48AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 17.12.24 00:58, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Dec 2024, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> > > On 14.12.24 15:38, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > I tried to use the patches to build binary packages for Debian. Found
> > > > some
> > > > issues:
> > >
> > > tried to build libgcobol on more architectures, please find the attached
> > > patch
> > > to disable building libgcobol on some architectures.
> >
> > Enabling on x86_64-*-linux* and disabling on i?86-*-linux* is inherently
> > suspect since the difference between those is only about what the default
> > multilib is, and says nothing about the multilib used for a particular
> > compilation of libgcobol. (Of course we first need to fix multilib
> > support for libgcobol if that isn't working correctly - all target
> > libraries in GCC need proper multilib support.)
> >
>
> why is this suspect? looking at libtsan and libhwasan, these are only built
> for the 64bit variant, not for 32 and x32.
Even in that case it isn't decided based on the triplet but on whether
it is lp64 or not:
x86_64-*-linux* | i?86-*-linux*)
if test x$ac_cv_sizeof_void_p = x8; then
TSAN_SUPPORTED=yes
etc.
Though, it should be limited to lp64 only if there is a strong reason for
that...
Jakub
