Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> writes: > Like this? > > /home/jwakely/gcc/15/include/c++/15.0.0/generator:478:25: error: > static assertion failed: the argument that follows std::allocator_arg > must be convertible to the generator's allocator type > 478 | static_assert(convertible_to<const _Alloc&, _Allocator>, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Can we be more precise than "the argument"? Is "the coroutine > argument" accurate? The function that the argument is passed to is a > coroutine, so I think that's correct.
Yes, I think 'coroutine argument' is OK - this function is only called for allocating the coroutine state when a coroutine is starting, so it can't be anything else (well, unless the user does the call manually for some reason..). -- Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
