> > But yeah, thinking about it some more, 10000 seems like a lot. Maybe the > > limit > > could be 1000. That's also big enough. I could try to run the testcase > > set to > > 1000 on my not-so-powerful laptop this time and check that even on that > > machine > > it finishes "fast" (under a second I guess). > > > > I'm also open to any other ideas for how to choose this number. > > I guess it's how we choose other such numbers, so whatever you chose > is fine - I was mostly curious here ;)
I would go with 1000. Even for a large switch a second is a lot of time. -Andi
