On Thu, 28 Nov 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> In check_builtin_function_arguments in the _BitInt patchset I've changed
> INTEGER_TYPE tests to INTEGER_TYPE or BITINT_TYPE, but haven't done the
> same in fold_builtin_iseqsig, which now ICEs because of that.
> 
> The following patch fixes that.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

OK.

Richard.

> BTW, that TYPE_PRECISION (type0) >= TYPE_PRECISION (type1) test
> for REAL_TYPE vs. REAL_TYPE looks pretty random and dangerous, I think
> it would be useful to handle this builtin also in the C and C++ FEs,
> if both arguments have REAL_TYPE, use the FE specific routine to decide
> which types to use and error if a comparison between types would be
> erroneous (e.g. complain about _Decimal* vs. float/double/long
> double/_Float*, pick up the preferred type, complain about
> __ibm128 vs. _Float128 in C++, etc.).
> But the FEs can just promote one argument to the other in that case
> and keep fold_builtin_iseqsig as is for say Fortran and other FEs.
> 
> 2024-11-28  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR c/117802
>       * builtins.cc (fold_builtin_iseqsig): Handle BITINT_TYPE like
>       INTEGER_TYPE.
> 
>       * gcc.dg/builtin-iseqsig-1.c: New test.
>       * gcc.dg/bitint-118.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/builtins.cc.jj        2024-11-27 14:33:07.522815405 +0100
> +++ gcc/builtins.cc   2024-11-27 16:36:41.111547052 +0100
> @@ -9946,9 +9946,11 @@ fold_builtin_iseqsig (location_t loc, tr
>      /* Choose the wider of two real types.  */
>      cmp_type = TYPE_PRECISION (type0) >= TYPE_PRECISION (type1)
>        ? type0 : type1;
> -  else if (code0 == REAL_TYPE && code1 == INTEGER_TYPE)
> +  else if (code0 == REAL_TYPE
> +        && (code1 == INTEGER_TYPE || code1 == BITINT_TYPE))
>      cmp_type = type0;
> -  else if (code0 == INTEGER_TYPE && code1 == REAL_TYPE)
> +  else if ((code0 == INTEGER_TYPE || code0 == BITINT_TYPE)
> +        && code1 == REAL_TYPE)
>      cmp_type = type1;
>  
>    arg0 = builtin_save_expr (fold_convert_loc (loc, cmp_type, arg0));
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-iseqsig-1.c.jj       2024-11-27 
> 16:45:00.951518847 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-iseqsig-1.c  2024-11-27 17:03:48.029664444 
> +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "" } */
> +
> +int
> +foo (float x, int y)
> +{
> +  return __builtin_iseqsig (x, y) * 2 + __builtin_iseqsig (y, x);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +bar (double x, unsigned long y)
> +{
> +  return __builtin_iseqsig (x, y) * 2 + __builtin_iseqsig (y, x);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +baz (long double x, long long y)
> +{
> +  return __builtin_iseqsig (x, y) * 2 + __builtin_iseqsig (y, x);
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-118.c.jj      2024-11-27 16:45:21.457230486 
> +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-118.c 2024-11-27 17:01:55.968241400 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +/* PR c/117802 */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target bitint575 } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-std=c23" } */
> +
> +int
> +foo (float x, _BitInt(8) y)
> +{
> +  return __builtin_iseqsig (x, y) * 2 + __builtin_iseqsig (y, x);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +bar (double x, unsigned _BitInt(162) y)
> +{
> +  return __builtin_iseqsig (x, y) * 2 + __builtin_iseqsig (y, x);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +baz (long double x, _BitInt(574) y)
> +{
> +  return __builtin_iseqsig (x, y) * 2 + __builtin_iseqsig (y, x);
> +}
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to