On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 10:12:25AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Compilation of the following testcase hangs forever after emitting first
> error.  The problem is that in one place we just return error_mark_node
> directly rather than going through c_expr_sizeof_expr or c_expr_sizeof_type.
> The parsing of the expression could have called record_maybe_used_decl
> though, but nothing calls pop_maybe_used which needs to be called after
> parsing of every sizeof/typeof, successful or not.

Ah, I see.

> At the end of the toplevel declaration we free the parser_obstack and in
> another function record_maybe_used_decl is called again and due to the
> missing pop_maybe_unused we end up with a cycle in the chain.
> 
> The following patch fixes it by just setting error and goto to the
>     sizeof_expr:
>       c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings--;
>       in_sizeof--;
>       mark_exp_read (expr.value);
>       if (TREE_CODE (expr.value) == COMPONENT_REF
>           && DECL_C_BIT_FIELD (TREE_OPERAND (expr.value, 1)))
>         error_at (expr_loc, "%<sizeof%> applied to a bit-field");
>       result = c_expr_sizeof_expr (expr_loc, expr);
> where c_expr_sizeof_expr will do:
>   struct c_expr ret;
>   if (expr.value == error_mark_node)
>     {
>       ret.value = error_mark_node;
>       ret.original_code = ERROR_MARK;
>       ret.original_type = NULL;
>       ret.m_decimal = 0;
>       pop_maybe_used (false);
>     }
> ...
>   return ret;
> which is exactly what the old code did manually except for the missing
> pop_maybe_used call.  mark_exp_read does nothing on error_mark_node and
> error_mark_node doesn't have COMPONENT_REF tree_code.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
> 
> 2024-11-27  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR c/117745
>       * c-parser.cc (c_parser_sizeof_expression): If type_name is NULL,
>       just expr.set_error () and goto sizeof_expr instead of doing error
>       recovery manually.
> 
>       * gcc.dg/pr117745.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/c/c-parser.cc.jj      2024-11-23 13:00:28.328028242 +0100
> +++ gcc/c/c-parser.cc 2024-11-26 11:59:18.036410746 +0100
> @@ -10405,13 +10405,8 @@ c_parser_sizeof_expression (c_parser *pa
>        finish = parser->tokens_buf[0].location;
>        if (type_name == NULL)
>       {
> -       struct c_expr ret;
> -       c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings--;
> -       in_sizeof--;
> -       ret.set_error ();
> -       ret.original_code = ERROR_MARK;
> -       ret.original_type = NULL;
> -       return ret;
> +       expr.set_error ();
> +       goto sizeof_expr;

Patch is OK, though I'd appreciate a comment explaining why we bother to
call c_expr_sizeof_expr.  Maybe

  /* Let c_expr_sizeof_expr call pop_maybe_used; the parsing of the
     expression could have called record_maybe_used_decl.  */

or something like that.  c_expr_sizeof_type doesn't do it, so that wouldn't
do.

>       }
>        if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_OPEN_BRACE))
>       {
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr117745.c.jj        2024-11-26 12:07:11.120756946 
> +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr117745.c   2024-11-26 12:08:00.031068850 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +/* PR c/117745 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "" } */
> +
> +static int foo (void);
> +void bar (void) { sizeof (int [0 ? foo () : 1); }    /* { dg-error 
> "expected" } */
> +static int baz (void);
> +void qux (void) { sizeof (sizeof (int[baz ()])); }
> 
>       Jakub
> 

Marek

Reply via email to