Joseph Myers <josmy...@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
>
>> -The @code{__has_include} operator by itself, without any @var{operand} or
>> -parentheses, acts as a predefined macro so that support for it can be tested
>> -in portable code. Thus, the recommended use of the operator is as follows:
>> +The @code{__has_include} and @code{__has_include_next} operators by
>> +themselves, without any @var{operand} or parentheses, acts as a
>> +predefined macro so that support for it can be tested in portable code.
>> +Thus, the recommended use of the operators is as follows:
>
> Some things need updating for the plural: "*act* as predefined *macros* so
> that support for *them* can be tested" (not "acts", "macro", "it", and
> remove "a" before "predefined").
>
> OK with those fixes.
Ah, duh. I missed that in review - fixed.
Pushed with the following text:
The @code{__has_include} and @code{__has_include_next} operators by
themselves, without any @var{operand} or parentheses, act as
predefined macros so that support for them can be tested in portable
code. Thus, the recommended use of the operators is as follows:
Thanks, have a lovely night.
--
Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
