Andreas reported GCC mis-compiled GAS for risc-v Thankfully he also reduced it to a nice little testcase.

So the whole point of the pattern in question is to "reduce" the constants by right shifting away common unnecessary bits in RTL expressions like this:

  [(set (pc)
        (if_then_else (any_eq
                    (and:ANYI (match_operand:ANYI 1 "register_operand" "r")
                          (match_operand 2 "shifted_const_arith_operand" "i"))
                    (match_operand 3 "shifted_const_arith_operand" "i"))
         (label_ref (match_operand 0 "" ""))
         (pc)))


When applicable, the reduced constants in operands 2/3 fit into a simm12 and thus do not need multi-instruction synthesis. Note that we have to also shift operand 1.

That shift should have been an arithmetic shift, but was incorrectly coded as a logical shift.

Fixed with the obvious change on the right shift opcode.

Expecting to push to the trunk once the pre-commit tester renders its verdict. I've already tested in this my tester for rv32 and rv64.

Jeff
gcc/
        * config/riscv/riscv.md (branch on masked/shifted operands): Use
        arithmetic rather than logical shift for operand 1.

gcc/testsuite

        * gcc.target/riscv/branch-1.c: Update expected output.
        * gcc.target/riscv/pr117649.c: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md
index 5b7b73535a3..eb5cd6fbe82 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md
@@ -3153,7 +3153,7 @@ (define_insn_and_split 
"*branch<ANYI:mode>_shiftedarith_<optab>_shifted"
                                             INTVAL (operands[3]))"
   "#"
   "&& reload_completed"
-  [(set (match_dup 4) (lshiftrt:X (match_dup 1) (match_dup 7)))
+  [(set (match_dup 4) (ashiftrt:X (match_dup 1) (match_dup 7)))
    (set (match_dup 4) (and:X (match_dup 4) (match_dup 8)))
    (set (match_dup 5) (match_dup 9))
    (set (pc) (if_then_else (any_eq (match_dup 4) (match_dup 5))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/branch-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/branch-1.c
index 7fa87832484..52fc1271c5b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/branch-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/branch-1.c
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ void f6(long long a)
 }
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "slli\t" 2 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "srli\t" 5 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "srai\t" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "srli\t" 3 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "andi\t" 3 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tli\t" 3 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "addi\t" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr117649.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr117649.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d0e7414e97e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr117649.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+
+void exit (int);
+
+void __attribute__ ((noinline))
+f (unsigned int i)
+{
+  if ((i & 0xf0000000) != 0xc0000000) __builtin_abort ();
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  f (0xc0000022);
+  exit (0);
+}

Reply via email to