Mike Stump wrote: > This patch adds __int256 to the front-ends. We follow the __int128 code > fairly closely... > > So, an outstanding question would be, how do I get the mangle codes > allocated for the type? I just choose two unused codes, for now. All in > all, the patch was pretty straight forward. > > We have another patch underway to do N-bit constant ints, where N is defined > by the port. This patch is in the process of being reviewed now, and Kenny > should be able to submit it shortly.
The avr port defines __int24 and __uint24. Is that compatible with a generic __int24? Johann > I tried hard to find all the __int128 bits, but, if there are any I missed, > love to have a pointer to them. > > So, I think we have to resolve which mangle codes to use in some before this > goes in, aside from that, Ok?
