Wednesday, October 23, 2024 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com> wrote:
> Or, even if that does work, it isn't clear to me why patching > ASM_OUTPUT_ALIGNED_LOCAL is a complete solution to the problem. This patch reproduces the same code as it was done without declaring ASM_OUTPUT_ALIGNED_LOCAL. ASM_OUTPUT_ALIGNED_LOCAL is needed to get the alignment value and handle it when it is bigger than BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT. In all other cases, the code is the same. https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/varasm.cc;h=c2540055421641caed08113d92dbeff7ffc09f49;hb=refs/heads/master#l2137 https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/varasm.cc;h=c2540055421641caed08113d92dbeff7ffc09f49;hb=refs/heads/master#l2233 Regards, Evgeny
