Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 14. -- 8< --
The patch for PR92687 handled the usual case of a decomp variable not being in the table, but missed the case of there being nothing in the table yet. PR c++/117107 PR c++/92687 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * decl.cc (lookup_decomp_type): Handle null table. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/decomp10.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/decl.cc | 5 +++-- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/decomp10.C | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/decomp10.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc index 7281818be8f..354b224fd6b 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc @@ -9446,8 +9446,9 @@ static GTY((cache)) decl_tree_cache_map *decomp_type_table; tree lookup_decomp_type (tree v) { - if (tree *slot = decomp_type_table->get (v)) - return *slot; + if (decomp_type_table) + if (tree *slot = decomp_type_table->get (v)) + return *slot; return NULL_TREE; } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/decomp10.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/decomp10.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8fe425b5d01 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/decomp10.C @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +// PR c++/117107 +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } +// { dg-options "" } + +template <typename, typename> +constexpr bool is_same = false; // { dg-warning "variable template" "" { target c++11_down } } +template <typename T> +constexpr bool is_same<T, T> = true; // { dg-warning "variable template" "" { target c++11_down } } + +struct tuple { + template <unsigned long I> + void check_tuple_like() { + tuple t; + auto [v, r] = t; // { dg-warning "structured bindings" "" { target c++14_down } } + (void)[v, r] { // { dg-warning "captured structured" "" { target c++17_down } } + decltype(v) x; + }; + } + int a = 0; + int &b = a; +}; base-commit: f191c8301545658543773ba3d0e6f3f0927529e0 prerequisite-patch-id: fea7085e225c97bf6ef676d9a628cc9abe9ae3cb -- 2.47.0