gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv-string.cc (expand_block_move): Fix
indentation.
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv-string.cc | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-string.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-string.cc
index 4bb8bcec4a5..0c5ffd7d861 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-string.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-string.cc
@@ -1086,22 +1086,22 @@ expand_block_move (rtx dst_in, rtx src_in, rtx
length_in)
{
HOST_WIDE_INT length = INTVAL (length_in);
- /* By using LMUL=8, we can copy as many bytes in one go as there
- are bits in a vector register. If the entire block thus fits,
- we don't need a loop. */
- if (length <= TARGET_MIN_VLEN)
- {
- need_loop = false;
-
- /* If a single scalar load / store pair can do the job, leave it
- to the scalar code to do that. */
- /* ??? If fast unaligned access is supported, the scalar code could
- use suitably sized scalars irrespective of alignment. If that
- gets fixed, we have to adjust the test here. */
-
- if (pow2p_hwi (length) && length <= potential_ew)
- return false;
- }
+ /* By using LMUL=8, we can copy as many bytes in one go as there
+ are bits in a vector register. If the entire block thus fits,
+ we don't need a loop. */
+ if (length <= TARGET_MIN_VLEN)
+ {
+ need_loop = false;
+
+ /* If a single scalar load / store pair can do the job, leave it
+ to the scalar code to do that. */
+ /* ??? If fast unaligned access is supported, the scalar code could
+ use suitably sized scalars irrespective of alignment. If that
+ gets fixed, we have to adjust the test here. */
+
+ if (pow2p_hwi (length) && length <= potential_ew)
+ return false;
+ }
/* Find the vector mode to use. Using the largest possible element
size is likely to give smaller constants, and thus potentially
--
2.43.0
