Hi Paul,
thanks for the review. Committed as: gcc-15-4405-ge32fff675c3
Thanks again,
Andre
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:41:09 +0100
Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> The handling of submodules is something of a kludge, especially where
> module procedures are concerned, that seems to work OK. Given that, your
> patch looks right and is good for mainline.
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 08:21, Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > PING.
> >
> > Re-Regtested ok again on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Ok for mainline?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andre
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 12:29:21 +0200
> > Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all and esp. Paul,
> > >
> > > the attached patch fixes an ICE with coarrays defined in modules and
> > then used
> > > in submodules. Referencing the variable relied on the curr_module being
> > set in
> > > the gfc_build_qualified_array routine, which it was not. I therefore
> > took the
> > > name from the symbol. I don't know if this is correct. Paul any idea?
> > You have
> > > done the submodule part in the past. I am still not sure, if the coarray
> > is
> > > exported into the .mod file correctly, because it gets host_assoc set,
> > while I
> > > would expect it to have use_assoc set. So may be this patch is only
> > healing
> > > the symptom and not the cause. Could you have a look, please?
> > >
> > > Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / Fedora 39. Ok for mainline?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Andre
> > > --
> > > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
> >
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
