On 10/9/24 2:59 AM, Jovan Vukic wrote:
After the valuable feedback I received, it’s clear to me that the
oversight was in the tests showing the benefits of the patch. In the
test file, I added functions f5 and f6, which now generate more
efficient code with fewer instructions.
Before the patch:
f5:
li a4,2097152
addi a4,a4,-2048
li a5,1167360
and a0,a0,a4
addi a5,a5,-2048
beq a0,a5,.L4
f6:
li a5,3407872
addi a5,a5,-2048
and a0,a0,a5
li a5,1114112
beq a0,a5,.L7
After the patch:
f5:
srli a5,a0,11
andi a5,a5,1023
li a4,569
beq a5,a4,.L5
f6:
srli a5,a0,11
andi a5,a5,1663
li a4,544
beq a5,a4,.L9
2024-10-09 Jovan Vukic <[email protected]>
PR target/115921
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/iterators.md (any_eq): New code iterator.
* config/riscv/riscv.h (COMMON_TRAILING_ZEROS): New macro.
(SMALL_AFTER_COMMON_TRAILING_SHIFT): Ditto.
* config/riscv/riscv.md
(*branch<ANYI:mode>_shiftedarith_<optab>_shifted):
New pattern.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/branch-1.c: Additional tests.
THanks! I've pushed this to the trunk.
Jeff
