On 9/27/24 09:49, Cupertino Miranda wrote:
> Based on observation within bpf-next selftests and comparisson of GCC
> and clang compiled code, the BPF loader expects all CO-RE relocations to
> point to BTF non const type nodes.
> ---
>  gcc/btfout.cc                                 |  2 +-
>  gcc/config/bpf/btfext-out.cc                  |  6 ++++
>  gcc/ctfc.h                                    |  2 ++
>  .../gcc.target/bpf/core-attr-const.c          | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/core-attr-const.c
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/btfout.cc b/gcc/btfout.cc
> index 8b91bde8798..24f62ec1a52 100644
> --- a/gcc/btfout.cc
> +++ b/gcc/btfout.cc
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ get_btf_kind (uint32_t ctf_kind)
>  
>  /* Convenience wrapper around get_btf_kind for the common case.  */
>  
> -static uint32_t
> +uint32_t
>  btf_dtd_kind (ctf_dtdef_ref dtd)
>  {
>    if (!dtd)
> diff --git a/gcc/config/bpf/btfext-out.cc b/gcc/config/bpf/btfext-out.cc
> index 095c35b894b..655da23066d 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/bpf/btfext-out.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/bpf/btfext-out.cc
> @@ -320,6 +320,12 @@ bpf_core_reloc_add (const tree type, const char * 
> section_name,
>    ctf_container_ref ctfc = ctf_get_tu_ctfc ();
>    ctf_dtdef_ref dtd = ctf_lookup_tree_type (ctfc, type);
>  
> +  /* Make sure CO-RE type is never the const version.  */
> +  if (btf_dtd_kind (dtd) == BTF_KIND_CONST

Hm, what about volatile and restrict? I would guess they are treated in
the same way as const by the kernel BPF loader, so probably we will have
to handle them here also. Please check.

> +      && kind >= BPF_RELO_FIELD_BYTE_OFFSET
> +      && kind <= BPF_RELO_FIELD_RSHIFT_U64)
> +    dtd = dtd->ref_type;
> +
>    /* Buffer the access string in the auxiliary strtab.  */
>    bpfcr->bpfcr_astr_off = 0;
>    gcc_assert (accessor != NULL);
> diff --git a/gcc/ctfc.h b/gcc/ctfc.h
> index 41e1169f271..e5967f590f9 100644
> --- a/gcc/ctfc.h
> +++ b/gcc/ctfc.h
> @@ -465,4 +465,6 @@ extern void btf_mark_type_used (tree);
>  extern int ctfc_get_dtd_srcloc (ctf_dtdef_ref, ctf_srcloc_ref);
>  extern int ctfc_get_dvd_srcloc (ctf_dvdef_ref, ctf_srcloc_ref);
>  
> +extern uint32_t btf_dtd_kind (ctf_dtdef_ref dtd);
> +
>  #endif /* GCC_CTFC_H */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/core-attr-const.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/core-attr-const.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..34a4a9cc5e8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/core-attr-const.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +/* Test to make sure CO-RE access relocs point to non const versions of the
> +   type.  */
> +
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O0 -dA -gbtf -mco-re -masm=normal" } */
> +
> +struct S {
> +  int a;
> +  int b;
> +  int c;
> +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
> +
> +void
> +func (struct S * s)
> +{
> +  int *x;
> +  int *y;
> +  const struct S *cs = s;
> +
> +  /* 0:2 */
> +  x = &(s->c);
> +
> +  /* 0:2 */
> +  y = (int *) &(cs->c);
> +
> +  *x = 4;
> +  *y = 4;
> +}
> +
> +/* Both const and non const struct type should have the same bpfcr_type. */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x1\t# bpfcr_type \\(struct S\\)" 1 } 
> } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x1\t# bpfcr_type \\(const struct 
> S\\)" 1 } } */

Reply via email to