Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@gmail.com> 于2024年9月5日周四 16:36写道:
>
> LGTM, thanks for catching this, but commit log seems not right?
> should it be -print-multi-directory or -print-multi-os-directory
> rather than --print-multilib-os-dir?

Yes. It is a typo.
I used `--print-multilib-os-dir`, and yes, as you said, `-print-multi-directory`
has same problem.

> (I guess should be -print-multi-directory per your output)
>
> Anyway, you can go ahead and push that after the fix:)
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:30 PM YunQiang Su <s...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: YunQiang Su <yunqi...@isrc.iscas.ac.cn>
> >
> > When use --print-multilib-os-dir, gcc outputs different value
> > with full -march option and the base one only.
> >
> > $ ./gcc/xgcc --print-multilib-os-dir -mabi=lp64d -march=rv64gc
> > lib64/lp64d
> >
> > $ ./gcc/xgcc --print-multilib-os-dir -mabi=lp64d -march=rv64gc_zba
> > .
> >
> > The reason is that in multilib.h, the fallback value of multilib
> > is listed as the 1st one in `multilib_raw[]`.
> >
> > gcc
> >         * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc(riscv_select_multilib_by_abi):
> >         look up reversely as the fallback path is listed as the 1st one.
> > ---
> >  gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc 
> > b/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
> > index 62c6e1dab1f..2c1ce7fc7cb 100644
> > --- a/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
> > @@ -2079,7 +2079,7 @@ riscv_select_multilib_by_abi (
> >    const std::string &riscv_current_abi_str,
> >    const std::vector<riscv_multi_lib_info_t> &multilib_infos)
> >  {
> > -  for (size_t i = 0; i < multilib_infos.size (); ++i)
> > +  for (ssize_t i = multilib_infos.size (); i >= 0; --i)
> >      if (riscv_current_abi_str == multilib_infos[i].abi_str)
> >        return xstrdup (multilib_infos[i].path.c_str ());
> >
> > --
> > 2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)
> >

Reply via email to