On 9/3/24 2:47 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/14?
OK.
-- >8 --
We ICE in nothrow_spec_p because it got a DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT.
This DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT was created in implicitly_declare_fn
when declaring
Foo& operator=(Foo&&) = default;
in the test. The problem is that in resolve_overloaded_unification
we call maybe_instantiate_noexcept before try_one_overload only in
the TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR case.
PR c++/113108
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (resolve_overloaded_unification): Call
maybe_instantiate_noexcept.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type28.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/pt.cc | 2 ++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type28.C | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type28.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 024fa8a5529..747e627f547 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -23787,6 +23787,8 @@ resolve_overloaded_unification (tree tparms,
for (lkp_iterator iter (arg); iter; ++iter)
{
tree fn = *iter;
+ if (flag_noexcept_type)
+ maybe_instantiate_noexcept (fn, tf_none);
if (try_one_overload (tparms, targs, tempargs, parm, TREE_TYPE (fn),
strict, sub_strict, addr_p, explain_p)
&& (!goodfn || !decls_match (goodfn, fn)))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type28.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type28.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bf0b927b8ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type28.C
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// PR c++/113108
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+
+template <typename T>
+struct Foo {
+ Foo& operator=(Foo&&) = default;
+ T data;
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+void consume(Foo<T>& (Foo<T>::*)(Foo<T>&&) ) {}
+
+template <typename T>
+void consume(Foo<T>& (Foo<T>::*)(Foo<T>&&) noexcept) {}
+
+int main() {
+ consume(&Foo<int>::operator=);
+}
base-commit: f0ab3de6ec0e3540f2e57f3f5628005f0a4e3fa5