Hi Uros,

As requested this patch is split out from my previous submission.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/659450.html
This patch enables STV when the first operand of a TImode binary
logic operand (AND, IOR or XOR) is a memory operand, which is commonly
the case with read-modify-write instructions.

A different motivating example from the one given above is:

__int128 m, p, q;
void foo() {
    m ^= (p & q);
}

Currently with -O2 -mavx, RMW instructions are rejected by STV,
resulting in scalar code:

foo:    movq    p(%rip), %rax
        movq    p+8(%rip), %rdx
        andq    q(%rip), %rax
        andq    q+8(%rip), %rdx
        xorq    %rax, m(%rip)
        xorq    %rdx, m+8(%rip)
        ret

With this patch they become scalar-to-vector candidates:

foo:    vmovdqa p(%rip), %xmm0
        vpand   q(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
        vpxor   m(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
        vmovdqa %xmm0, m(%rip)
        ret


This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32}
with no new failures.  Ok for mainline?


2024-08-31  Roger Sayle  <ro...@nextmovesoftware.com>

gcc/ChangeLog
        * config/i386/i386-features.cc
(timode_scalar_to_vector_candidate_p):
        Support the first operand of AND, IOR and XOR being MEM_P, i.e. a
        read-modify-write insn.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
        * gcc.target/i386/movti-2.c: Change dg-options to -Os.
        * gcc.target/i386/movti-4.c: Expected output of original movti-2.c.


Thanks in advance,
Roger
--

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
index c09a5c7..3434d00 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
@@ -2330,14 +2330,16 @@ timode_scalar_to_vector_candidate_p (rtx_insn *insn)
              || CONST_SCALAR_INT_P (XEXP (src, 1))
              || timode_mem_p (XEXP (src, 1))))
        return true;
-      return REG_P (XEXP (src, 0))
+      return (REG_P (XEXP (src, 0))
+             || timode_mem_p (XEXP (src, 0)))
             && (REG_P (XEXP (src, 1))
                 || CONST_SCALAR_INT_P (XEXP (src, 1))
                 || timode_mem_p (XEXP (src, 1)));
 
     case IOR:
     case XOR:
-      return REG_P (XEXP (src, 0))
+      return (REG_P (XEXP (src, 0))
+             || timode_mem_p (XEXP (src, 0)))
             && (REG_P (XEXP (src, 1))
                 || CONST_SCALAR_INT_P (XEXP (src, 1))
                 || timode_mem_p (XEXP (src, 1)));
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/movti-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/movti-2.c
index 73f69d2..c3a6ae3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/movti-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/movti-2.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -mavx" } */
+/* { dg-options "-Os -mavx" } */
 __int128 m;
 
 void foo()
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/movti-4.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/movti-4.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eac66fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/movti-4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mavx" } */
+__int128 m;
+
+void foo()
+{
+    m &= ((__int128)0x0123456789abcdefULL<<64) | 0x0123456789abcdefULL;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "movabsq" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpand" 1 } } */

Reply via email to