> Am 27.08.2024 um 06:12 schrieb Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de>:
>
> This new test was reported to be still failing on sparc targets.
> Here the number of DW_AT_ranges dropped to zero.
> The test should pass on this architecture with -Os, -O2 and -O3.
> I tried to improve also different known problematic targets,
> where only one subroutine had DW_AT_ranges:
> Those are armhf (arm with hard float), powerpc and powerpc64.
> The best option is to use -Os: So far the only one, where
> all two inline instances in this test had two DW_AT_ranges.
Ok
Richard
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> PR other/116462
> * gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c: Switch to -Os optimization.
> ---
> Hopefully this will be the final act, OK for trunk?
>
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
> index 083df5b586c..8b2fa1210ad 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> /* Verify that at least one of both inline instances have
> a DW_AT_ranges but no extra DW_TAG_lexical_block. */
> -/* { dg-options "-O -gdwarf -dA" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-Os -gdwarf -dA" } */
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\(DIE \\(\[^\n\]*\\)
> DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine" 2 } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler " DW_AT_ranges" } } */
> --
> 2.39.2
>
