Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

-- >8 --
Here we initialize an enumerator with a class prvalue with a conversion
function.  When we fold it in build_enumerator, we create a TARGET_EXPR
for the object, and subsequently crash in tsubst_expr, which should not
see such a code.

Normally, we fix similar problems by using an IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR but here
I may get away with not using the result of fold_non_dependent_expr unless
the result is a constant.  A TARGET_EXPR is not constant.

        PR c++/115657

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * decl.cc (build_enumerator): Call maybe_fold_non_dependent_expr
        instead of fold_non_dependent_expr.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-recursion2.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/template/conv21.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/decl.cc                                | 10 +++++++--
 .../g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-recursion2.C       | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/conv21.C        | 14 ++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-recursion2.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/conv21.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
index f23b635aec9..12139e1d862 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
@@ -17387,9 +17387,15 @@ build_enumerator (tree name, tree value, tree 
enumtype, tree attributes,
   tree type;
 
   /* scalar_constant_value will pull out this expression, so make sure
-     it's folded as appropriate.  */
+     it's folded as appropriate.
+
+     Creating a TARGET_EXPR in a template breaks when substituting, and
+     here we would create it for instance when using a class prvalue with
+     a user-defined conversion function.  So don't use such a tree.  We
+     instantiate VALUE here to get errors about bad enumerators even in
+     a template that does not get instantiated.  */
   if (processing_template_decl)
-    value = fold_non_dependent_expr (value);
+    value = maybe_fold_non_dependent_expr (value);
 
   /* If the VALUE was erroneous, pretend it wasn't there; that will
      result in the enum being assigned the next value in sequence.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-recursion2.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-recursion2.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f268f52e2b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-recursion2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// PR c++/115657
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wall" }
+
+// Like constexpr-recursion1.C but use a class with a conversion function.
+
+struct X {
+  constexpr operator int() { return 0; }
+};
+
+template <int N>
+constexpr X f1 ()
+{
+  enum E { a = f1<0> () }; // { dg-error "called in a constant expression 
before its definition is complete|is not an integer constant" }
+  return {};
+}
+
+constexpr X f3 ()
+{
+  enum E { a = f3 () };        // { dg-error "called in a constant expression 
before its definition is complete|is not an integer constant" }
+  return {};
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/conv21.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/conv21.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1dc7b3d50d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/conv21.C
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// PR c++/115657
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct NonIntegral
+{
+    constexpr operator int() { return 0; }
+};
+
+template<typename T> struct TemplatedStructural
+{
+    enum { e = NonIntegral{} };
+};
+
+template struct TemplatedStructural<void>;

base-commit: 9cdde72d1cefdf2ffff52ad2eec1ff465dccb3ab
-- 
2.46.0

Reply via email to