Hi,

Commit r15-2084 exposes one ICE in LRA.  Firstly, before
r15-2084 KFmode has 126 bit precision while V1TImode has 128
bit precision, so the subreg (subreg:V1TI (reg:KF 131) 0) is
paradoxical_subreg_p, which stops some passes from doing
some optimization.  After r15-2084, KFmode has the same mode
precision as V1TImode, passes are able to optimize more, but
it causes this ICE in LRA as described below:

For insn 106 (set (mem:V1TI ...) (subreg:V1TI (reg:KF 133) 0)),
which matches pattern

(define_insn "*vsx_le_perm_store_<mode>"
  [(set (match_operand:VSX_LE_128 0 "memory_operand" "=Z,Q")
        (match_operand:VSX_LE_128 1 "vsx_register_operand" "+wa,r"))]
  "!BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN && TARGET_VSX && !TARGET_P9_VECTOR
   && !altivec_indexed_or_indirect_operand (operands[0], <MODE>mode)"
  "@
   #
   #"
  [(set_attr "type" "vecstore,store")
   (set_attr "length" "12,8")
   (set_attr "isa" "<VSisa>,*")])

LRA makes equivalence substitution on r133 with const double
(const_double:KF 0.0), selects alternative 0 and fixes up
operand 1 for constraint "wa", because operand 1 is OP_INOUT,
so it considers assigning back to it as well, that is:

  lra_emit_move (type == OP_INOUT ? copy_rtx (old) : old, new_reg);

But because old has been changed to const_double in equivalence
substitution, the move is actually assigning to const_double,
which is invalid and cause ICE.

Considering reg:KF 133 is equivalent with (const_double:KF 0.0)
even though this operand is OP_INOUT, IMHO there should not be
any following uses of reg:KF 133, otherwise it doesn't have the
chance to be equivalent to (const_double:KF 0.0).  From this
perspective, I think we can guard the lra_emit_move with
nonimmediate_operand to exclude such case.

Does it sound reasonable?

btw, I also tried with disallowing equivalence substitution with
CONSTANT_P value if the corresponding operand is OP_INOUT or
OP_OUT, it can also fix this issue, but with more thinking it
seems not necessary to stop such substitution if we can handle it
later as above.

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux and
powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu.

BR,
Kewen
-----
        PR rtl-optimization/116170

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * lra-constraints.cc (curr_insn_transform): Don't emit move back to
        old operand if it's nonimmediate_operand.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr116170.c: New test.
---
 gcc/lra-constraints.cc                      |  3 ++-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr116170.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr116170.c

diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.cc b/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
index 92b343fa99a..024c85c87d9 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
+++ b/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
@@ -4742,7 +4742,8 @@ curr_insn_transform (bool check_only_p)
            }
          *loc = new_reg;
          if (type != OP_IN
-             && find_reg_note (curr_insn, REG_UNUSED, old) == NULL_RTX)
+             && find_reg_note (curr_insn, REG_UNUSED, old) == NULL_RTX
+             && nonimmediate_operand (old, GET_MODE (old)))
            {
              start_sequence ();
              lra_emit_move (type == OP_INOUT ? copy_rtx (old) : old, new_reg);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr116170.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr116170.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6f6ca0f1ae9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr116170.c
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target ppc_float128_sw } */
+/* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power8 -O2 -fstack-protector-strong 
-ffloat-store" } */
+
+/* Verify there is no ICE.  */
+
+int a, d;
+_Float128 b, c;
+void
+e ()
+{
+  int f = 0;
+  if (a)
+    if (b || c)
+      f = 1;
+  if (d)
+    e (f ? 0 : b);
+}
--
2.43.5

Reply via email to