On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 09:40:06AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:29 PM Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > This is a small cleanup with respect to the ranger_op_table class.
> > There should only ever be one instance of ranger_op_table so
> > this adds a static member function which returns the instance.
> > A few variables that are defined in range-op.cc should be local
> > to the file so wrap them with an anonymous namespace.
> > Also change operator_table into a reference that is initialized to
> > the singelton.
> >
> > This has a small extra overhead at intiialization time of the
> > operator_table;
> > could be improved if we used C++20's consteval. Since this happens only
> > once,
> > there it should be ok.
>
> Can you make it so with appropriate #if __cplusplus or __has_feature
> (consteval)
> (or how that's done)?
That would be
#if __cpp_consteval >= 201811L
unless you need the P2564R3 paper behavior (then it would be
#if __cpp_consteval >= 202211L
).
Jakub
