From: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com>

This patch would like to support the form 1 of the scalar signed
integer .SAT_ADD.  Aka below example:

Form 1:
  #define DEF_SAT_S_ADD_FMT_1(T)             \
  T __attribute__((noinline))                \
  sat_s_add_##T##_fmt_1 (T x, T y)           \
  {                                          \
    T min = (T)1u << (sizeof (T) * 8 - 1);   \
    T max = min - 1;                         \
    return (x ^ y) < 0                       \
      ? (T)(x + y)                           \
      : ((T)(x + y) ^ x) >= 0                \
        ? (T)(x + y)                         \
        : x < 0 ? min : max;                 \
  }

DEF_SAT_S_ADD_FMT_1 (int64_t)

We can tell the difference before and after this patch if backend
implemented the ssadd<m>3 pattern similar as below.

Before this patch:
   4   │ __attribute__((noinline))
   5   │ int64_t sat_s_add_int64_t_fmt_1 (int64_t x, int64_t y)
   6   │ {
   7   │   long int _1;
   8   │   long int _2;
   9   │   long int _3;
  10   │   int64_t _4;
  11   │   long int _7;
  12   │   _Bool _9;
  13   │   long int _10;
  14   │   long int _11;
  15   │   long int _12;
  16   │   long int _13;
  17   │
  18   │ ;;   basic block 2, loop depth 0
  19   │ ;;    pred:       ENTRY
  20   │   _1 = x_5(D) ^ y_6(D);
  21   │   _13 = x_5(D) + y_6(D);
  22   │   _3 = x_5(D) ^ _13;
  23   │   _2 = ~_1;
  24   │   _7 = _2 & _3;
  25   │   if (_7 >= 0)
  26   │     goto <bb 4>; [59.00%]
  27   │   else
  28   │     goto <bb 3>; [41.00%]
  29   │ ;;    succ:       4
  30   │ ;;                3
  31   │
  32   │ ;;   basic block 3, loop depth 0
  33   │ ;;    pred:       2
  34   │   _9 = x_5(D) < 0;
  35   │   _10 = (long int) _9;
  36   │   _11 = -_10;
  37   │   _12 = _11 ^ 9223372036854775807;
  38   │ ;;    succ:       4
  39   │
  40   │ ;;   basic block 4, loop depth 0
  41   │ ;;    pred:       2
  42   │ ;;                3
  43   │   # _4 = PHI <_13(2), _12(3)>
  44   │   return _4;
  45   │ ;;    succ:       EXIT
  46   │
  47   │ }

After this patch:
   4   │ __attribute__((noinline))
   5   │ int64_t sat_s_add_int64_t_fmt_1 (int64_t x, int64_t y)
   6   │ {
   7   │   int64_t _4;
   8   │
   9   │ ;;   basic block 2, loop depth 0
  10   │ ;;    pred:       ENTRY
  11   │   _4 = .SAT_ADD (x_5(D), y_6(D)); [tail call]
  12   │   return _4;
  13   │ ;;    succ:       EXIT
  14   │
  15   │ }

The below test suites are passed for this patch.
* The rv64gcv fully regression test.
* The x86 bootstrap test.
* The x86 fully regression test.

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * match.pd: Add the matching for signed .SAT_ADD.
        * tree-ssa-math-opts.cc (gimple_signed_integer_sat_add): Add new
        matching func decl.
        (match_unsigned_saturation_add): Try signed .SAT_ADD and rename
        to ...
        (match_saturation_add): ... here.
        (math_opts_dom_walker::after_dom_children): Update the above renamed
        func from caller.

Signed-off-by: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com>
---
 gcc/match.pd              | 14 +++++++++++++
 gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.cc | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index c9c8478d286..0a2ffc733d3 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -3311,6 +3311,20 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
   }
   (if (otype_precision < itype_precision && wi::eq_p (trunc_max, int_cst))))))
 
+/* Signed saturation add, case 1:
+   T min = (T)1u << (sizeof (T) * 8 - 1);
+   T max = min - 1;
+   SAT_S_ADD = (X ^ Y) < 0
+     ? (X + Y)
+     : ((T)(X + Y) ^ X) >= 0 ? (X + Y) : X < 0 ? min : max.  */
+(match (signed_integer_sat_add @0 @1)
+  (cond^ (ge (bit_and:c (bit_xor @0 (convert? @2)) (bit_not (bit_xor @0 @1)))
+   integer_zerop)
+   (convert? (plus@2 (convert1? @0) (convert1? @1)))
+   (bit_xor (negate (convert (lt @0 integer_zerop))) max_value))
+ (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)
+      && types_match (type, @0, @1))))
+
 /* x >  y  &&  x != XXX_MIN  -->  x > y
    x >  y  &&  x == XXX_MIN  -->  false . */
 (for eqne (eq ne)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.cc
index 8d96a4c964b..d5c9b475f72 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.cc
@@ -4023,6 +4023,8 @@ extern bool gimple_unsigned_integer_sat_add (tree, tree*, 
tree (*)(tree));
 extern bool gimple_unsigned_integer_sat_sub (tree, tree*, tree (*)(tree));
 extern bool gimple_unsigned_integer_sat_trunc (tree, tree*, tree (*)(tree));
 
+extern bool gimple_signed_integer_sat_add (tree, tree*, tree (*)(tree));
+
 static void
 build_saturation_binary_arith_call (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, internal_fn fn,
                                    tree lhs, tree op_0, tree op_1)
@@ -4072,7 +4074,8 @@ match_unsigned_saturation_add (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, 
gassign *stmt)
 }
 
 /*
- * Try to match saturation unsigned add with PHI.
+ * Try to match saturation add with PHI.
+ * For unsigned integer:
  *   <bb 2> :
  *   _1 = x_3(D) + y_4(D);
  *   if (_1 >= x_3(D))
@@ -4086,10 +4089,38 @@ match_unsigned_saturation_add (gimple_stmt_iterator 
*gsi, gassign *stmt)
  *   # _2 = PHI <255(2), _1(3)>
  *   =>
  *   <bb 4> [local count: 1073741824]:
- *   _2 = .SAT_ADD (x_4(D), y_5(D));  */
+ *   _2 = .SAT_ADD (x_4(D), y_5(D));
+ *
+ * For signed integer:
+ *   _1 = x_5(D) ^ y_6(D);
+ *   _13 = x_5(D) + y_6(D);
+ *   _3 = x_5(D) ^ _13;
+ *   _2 = ~_1;
+ *   _7 = _2 & _3;
+ *   if (_7 >= 0)
+ *     goto <bb 4>; [59.00%]
+ *   else
+ *     goto <bb 3>; [41.00%]
+ *   ;;    succ:       4
+ *   ;;                3
+ *   ;;   basic block 3, loop depth 0
+ *   ;;    pred:       2
+ *   _9 = x_5(D) < 0;
+ *   _10 = (long int) _9;
+ *   _11 = -_10;
+ *   _12 = _11 ^ 9223372036854775807;
+ *   ;;    succ:       4
+ *   ;;   basic block 4, loop depth 0
+ *   ;;    pred:       2
+ *   ;;                3
+ *   # _4 = PHI <_13(2), _12(3)>
+ *   =>
+ *   ;;   basic block 2, loop depth 0
+ *   ;;    pred:       ENTRY
+ *   _4 = .SAT_ADD (x_5(D), y_6(D)); [tail call]  */
 
 static void
-match_unsigned_saturation_add (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, gphi *phi)
+match_saturation_add (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, gphi *phi)
 {
   if (gimple_phi_num_args (phi) != 2)
     return;
@@ -4097,7 +4128,8 @@ match_unsigned_saturation_add (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, 
gphi *phi)
   tree ops[2];
   tree phi_result = gimple_phi_result (phi);
 
-  if (gimple_unsigned_integer_sat_add (phi_result, ops, NULL))
+  if (gimple_unsigned_integer_sat_add (phi_result, ops, NULL)
+      || gimple_signed_integer_sat_add (phi_result, ops, NULL))
     build_saturation_binary_arith_call (gsi, phi, IFN_SAT_ADD, phi_result,
                                        ops[0], ops[1]);
 }
@@ -6097,7 +6129,7 @@ math_opts_dom_walker::after_dom_children (basic_block bb)
     gsi_next (&psi))
     {
       gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_after_labels (bb);
-      match_unsigned_saturation_add (&gsi, psi.phi ());
+      match_saturation_add (&gsi, psi.phi ());
       match_unsigned_saturation_sub (&gsi, psi.phi ());
     }
 
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to