> Am 28.07.2024 um 16:27 schrieb Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>:
> 
> Bootstrapped on x86_64-linux and for msp430-elf cross with and without
> binutils for the target to verify the error is printed as expected.
> 
> The $invoked variable will be one of as, collect-ld, nm, or dsymutil,
> i.e. the tool that the script is invoking and wants to exec.
> 
> OK for trunk?
> 

Ok

Richard 
> -- >8 --
> 
> When users try to build a cross-compiler without first installing
> binutils they get confusing errors like:
> /tmp/gcc-obj/./gcc/as: line 114: exec: -m: invalid option
> 
> This is an incredibly common source of questions on gcc-help and IRC,
> and bogus bug reports e.g. see PR 116119 for the latest example.
> 
> This change adds an explicit check for an empty $original variable and
> exits with a user-friendly error.
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>    * exec-tool.in: Exit with an error if $original is empty.
> ---
> gcc/exec-tool.in | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/exec-tool.in b/gcc/exec-tool.in
> index 7d152e083a7..2767e1019b8 100644
> --- a/gcc/exec-tool.in
> +++ b/gcc/exec-tool.in
> @@ -81,6 +81,14 @@ case "$invoked" in
>     ;;
> esac
> 
> +if test -z "$original"
> +then
> +  echo "$0: \$original is unset" >&2
> +  echo "This probably means there is no '$invoked' for the target." >&2
> +  echo "For a cross-compiler, you probably need to install Binutils first." 
> >&2
> +  exit 1
> +fi
> +
> case "$original" in
>   ../*)
>     # compute absolute path of the location of this script
> --
> 2.45.2
> 

Reply via email to