On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 6:46 AM Seyed Sajad Kahani <sska1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This patch addresses a difference between the hash function and the equality
> function for canonical types of template parameters (ctp_hasher). The equality
> function uses comptypes (typeck.cc) (with COMPARE_STRUCTURAL) and checks
> constraint equality for two auto nodes (typeck.cc:1586), while the hash
> function ignores it (pt.cc:4528). This leads to hash collisions that can be
> avoided by using `hash_placeholder_constraint` (constraint.cc:1150).

By the way your mailer looks to have mangled the patch by removing white spaces.

Thanks,
Andrew

>
> * constraint.cc (hash_placeholder_constraint): Rename to
> iterative_hash_placeholder_constraint.
> (iterative_hash_placeholder_constraint): Rename from
> hash_placeholder_constraint and add the initial val argument.
> * cp-tree.h (hash_placeholder_constraint): Rename to
> iterative_hash_placeholder_constraint.
> (iterative_hash_placeholder_constraint): Renamed from
> hash_placeholder_constraint and add the initial val argument.
> * pt.cc (struct ctp_hasher): Updated to use
> iterative_hash_placeholder_constraint in the case of a valid placeholder
> constraint.
> (auto_hash::hash): Reflect the renaming of hash_placeholder_constraint to
> iterative_hash_placeholder_constraint.
> ---
> gcc/cp/constraint.cc | 4 ++--
> gcc/cp/cp-tree.h | 2 +-
> gcc/cp/pt.cc | 9 +++++++--
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
> index ebf4255e5..78aacb77a 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
> @@ -1971,13 +1971,13 @@ equivalent_placeholder_constraints (tree c1, tree c2)
> /* Return a hash value for the placeholder ATOMIC_CONSTR C. */
> hashval_t
> -hash_placeholder_constraint (tree c)
> +iterative_hash_placeholder_constraint (tree c, hashval_t val)
> {
> tree t, a;
> placeholder_extract_concept_and_args (c, t, a);
> /* Like hash_tmpl_and_args, but skip the first argument. */
> - hashval_t val = iterative_hash_object (DECL_UID (t), 0);
> + val = iterative_hash_object (DECL_UID (t), val);
> for (int i = TREE_VEC_LENGTH (a)-1; i > 0; --i)
> val = iterative_hash_template_arg (TREE_VEC_ELT (a, i), val);
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> index 4bb3e9c49..294e88f75 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> @@ -8588,7 +8588,7 @@ extern tree_pair finish_type_constraints (tree,
> tree, tsubst_flags_t);
> extern tree build_constrained_parameter (tree, tree, tree = NULL_TREE);
> extern void placeholder_extract_concept_and_args (tree, tree&, tree&);
> extern bool equivalent_placeholder_constraints (tree, tree);
> -extern hashval_t hash_placeholder_constraint (tree);
> +extern hashval_t iterative_hash_placeholder_constraint (tree, hashval_t);
> extern bool deduce_constrained_parameter (tree, tree&, tree&);
> extern tree resolve_constraint_check (tree);
> extern tree check_function_concept (tree);
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> index d1316483e..9a80c44a5 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> @@ -4525,7 +4525,12 @@ struct ctp_hasher : ggc_ptr_hash<tree_node>
> val = iterative_hash_object (TEMPLATE_TYPE_LEVEL (t), val);
> val = iterative_hash_object (TEMPLATE_TYPE_IDX (t), val);
> if (TREE_CODE (t) == TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM)
> - val = iterative_hash_template_arg (CLASS_PLACEHOLDER_TEMPLATE (t), val);
> + {
> + val
> + = iterative_hash_template_arg (CLASS_PLACEHOLDER_TEMPLATE (t), val);
> + if (tree c = NON_ERROR (PLACEHOLDER_TYPE_CONSTRAINTS (t)))
> + val = iterative_hash_placeholder_constraint(c, val);
> + }
> if (TREE_CODE (t) == BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM)
> val = iterative_hash_template_arg (TYPE_TI_ARGS (t), val);
> --comparing_specializations;
> @@ -29605,7 +29610,7 @@ auto_hash::hash (tree t)
> if (tree c = NON_ERROR (PLACEHOLDER_TYPE_CONSTRAINTS (t)))
> /* Matching constrained-type-specifiers denote the same template
> parameter, so hash the constraint. */
> - return hash_placeholder_constraint (c);
> + return iterative_hash_placeholder_constraint (c, 0);
> else
> /* But unconstrained autos are all separate, so just hash the pointer. */
> return iterative_hash_object (t, 0);
> --
> 2.45.2
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 14:41, Seyed Sajad Kahani <sska1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > While investigating a fix for C++/PR115030 (a bug in constrained auto
> > deduction), I was wondering why we are not substituting constraint args of 
> > an
> > auto node in tsubst (pt.cc:16533). Instead, this substitution is delayed 
> > until
> > do_auto_deduction (pt.cc), where we attempt to find the substituted args of 
> > the
> > enclosing scope. At that point, it becomes difficult to find partially
> > specialised args, as they are erased in the process. I propose modifying 
> > tsubst
> > to eagerly substitute the constraint args of an auto node.
> >
> > By making this change, we would not need to provide outer_targs for
> > do_auto_deduction in cases where tsubst has been called for the type, which
> > covers most scenarios. However, we still need outer_targs for cases like:
> >
> > template <typename T, C<T> auto V>
> > struct S { };
> >
> > Hence, outer_targs cannot be completely removed but will be set to 
> > TREE_NULL in
> > all calls except the one in convert_template_argument (pt.cc:8788).
> > Additionally, the tmpl argument of do_auto_deduction, which helps to provide
> > outer args in the scope, will no longer be necessary and can be safely
> > removed.
> >
> > Also, the trimming hack proposed in
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/654724.html to address
> > C++/PR114915 is no longer needed. We will add an assertion to ensure that 
> > the
> > missing levels do not become negative.
> >
> > Substituting constraint arguments earlier will slightly alter error messages
> > (see testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-placeholder3.C as an example).
> >
> > To summarise, I have made the following changes:
> > - Modified tsubst to substitute the constraint args.
> > - Fixed shallow checks for using the cache from TEMPLATE_TYPE_DESCENDANTS
> > (pt.cc:16513).
> > - Substituted the constraint args and the auto node itself, while retaining 
> > all
> > other parameters as is (pt.cc:16533).
> > - Removed now unnecessary code that attempted to find outer scope template 
> > info
> > and args in various locations.
> > - Updated the missing levels hack (pt.cc:31320) to work with the substituted
> > constraints.
> > - Used level instead of orig_level to find the missing levels.
> > - Added an assertion for future safety.
> >
> > Details of these changes can be found in the patch "[PATCH v1] c++: Eagerly
> > substitute auto constraint args in tsubst [PR115030]" that will be replied 
> > to
> > this thread.
> >
> > This patch, in my opinion, improves code quality by removing an argument 
> > from
> > do_auto_deduction and eliminating the out-of-scope task of finding 
> > outer_targs
> > within do_auto_deduction. It simplifies the usage of do_auto_deduction and
> > resolves C++/PR115030 without complex calculations for specialised args. It
> > also enhances the consistency of tsubst behaviour by not leaving constraints
> > un-substituted. However, these changes make args in constraints_satisfied_p
> > (being called from do_auto_deduction) a bit misleading, as it will not carry
> > the actual args of the constraint and can even be an empty vec.
> >
> > I have added a testsuite for C++/PR115030, and as far as I have tested (only
> > c++ dg.exp on x86_64-linux), there are no regressions.
> >
> > Extra:
> > While doing this, I also realised that the hash function in ctp_hasher (for
> > canonical type of template parameters) slightly differs from its equality
> > function. Specifically, the equality function uses comptypes (typeck.cc) 
> > (with
> > COMPARE_STRUCTURAL) and compares placeholder constraints (typeck.cc:1586),
> > while the hash function ignores them (pt.cc:4528). As a result, we can have 
> > two
> > types with equal hashes that are unequal. For example, assuming:
> >
> > template <typename T, typename U>
> > concept C1 = ...
> >
> > template <typename T, typename U>
> > concept C2 = ...
> >
> >
> > "C1<U> auto" and "C2<V> auto" have the same hash value but are unequal. This
> > issue does not cause any error (it is a hash collision and it is handled), 
> > but
> > it can be avoided by using hash_placeholder_constraint (constraint.cc:1150).
> >
> > Therefore, I have made the following changes:
> > - Fixed the hash function to calculate the hash of the constraint 
> > (pt.cc:4528).
> > - Slightly modified the existing hash_placeholder_constraint
> > (constraint.cc:1150) to accept the initial hash value as an argument.
> >
> > Details of these changes can be found in the patch "[PATCH v1] c++: Hash
> > placeholder constraint in ctp_hasher" that will be replied to this email.
> >
> > Thanks. I really appreciate your comments and feedback on these proposed
> > changes.

Reply via email to