On Jul 9, 2024, Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> wrote:
> if (!gimple_seq_empty_p (n) && !gimple_seq_empty_p (e))
> {
> geh_else *stmt = gimple_build_eh_else (n, e);
> gimple_seq_add_stmt (&cleanup, stmt);
> }
> Which essentially says “if either of the sub-expressions to this are empty,
> then do not build it”
> Was there a reason for this, or is it a typo?
Most certainly a thinko :-(
Thanks for identifying it and for proposing a fix for it!
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive
