On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 12:50 PM Evgeny Karpov <evgeny.kar...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > Thursday, June 27, 2024 10:39 AM > Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc > > > b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc > > > index 5dfa7d49f58..20adb42e17b 100644 > > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc > > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc > > > @@ -414,6 +414,10 @@ ix86_expand_move (machine_mode mode, rtx > > operands[]) > > > { > > > #if TARGET_PECOFF > > > tmp = legitimize_pe_coff_symbol (op1, addend != NULL_RTX); > > > +#else > > > + tmp = NULL_RTX; > > > +#endif > > > + > > > if (tmp) > > > { > > > op1 = tmp; > > > @@ -425,7 +429,6 @@ ix86_expand_move (machine_mode mode, rtx > > operands[]) > > > op1 = operands[1]; > > > break; > > > } > > > -#endif > > > } > > > > > > if (addend) > > > > tmp can only be set by legitimize_pe_coff_symbol, so !TARGET_PECOFF > > will always get to the "else" part. Do this change simply by moving > > #endif, like the below: > > > > --cut here-- > > iff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc > > index 5dfa7d49f58..407db6c215b 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc > > @@ -421,11 +421,11 @@ ix86_expand_move (machine_mode mode, rtx > > operands[]) > > break; > > } > > else > > +#endif > > { > > op1 = operands[1]; > > break; > > } > > -#endif > > } > > > > if (addend) > > --cut here-- > > > > I would prefer readability in the original version if there are no objections.
The proposed form is how existing TARGET_MACHO handles similar issue. Please see e.g. i386.cc, around line 6216 and elsewhere: #if TARGET_MACHO if (TARGET_MACHO) { switch_to_section (darwin_sections[picbase_thunk_section]); fputs ("\t.weak_definition\t", asm_out_file); assemble_name (asm_out_file, name); fputs ("\n\t.private_extern\t", asm_out_file); assemble_name (asm_out_file, name); putc ('\n', asm_out_file); ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL (asm_out_file, name); DECL_WEAK (decl) = 1; } else #endif if (USE_HIDDEN_LINKONCE) ... So, there is no problem having #endif just after else. Anyway, it's your call, this is not a hill I'm willing to die on. ;) Thanks, Uros.