On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 5:31 AM Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 11/05/24 02:01 -0700, Ken Matsui wrote:
> >This patch optimizes the compilation performance of std::is_pointer
> >by dispatching to the new __is_pointer built-in trait.
> >
> >libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h (__is_pointer): Use
> > __is_pointer built-in trait. Optimize its implementation.
> > * include/std/type_traits (is_pointer): Likewise.
> > (is_pointer_v): Likewise.
> >
> >Co-authored-by: Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]>
> >Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui <[email protected]>
> >---
> > libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h | 31 ++++++++++++++-
> > libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits | 44 +++++++++++++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h
> >b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h
> >index 59f1a1875eb..210a9ea00da 100644
> >--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h
> >+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h
> >@@ -363,6 +363,13 @@ __INT_N(__GLIBCXX_TYPE_INT_N_3)
> > //
> > // Pointer types
> > //
> >+#if _GLIBCXX_USE_BUILTIN_TRAIT(__is_pointer)
> >+ template<typename _Tp, bool _IsPtr = __is_pointer(_Tp)>
> >+ struct __is_pointer : __truth_type<_IsPtr>
>
> I was worried that reusing __is_pointer this way would cause a problem
> with Clang, because it has an __is_pointer built-in and the code above
> causes a warning:
>
> isp.cc:2:12: warning: keyword '__is_pointer' will be made available as an
> identifier for the remainder of the translation unit [-Wkeyword-compat]
> 2 | struct __is_pointer
> | ^
>
> I thought this warning meant it was only available as an identifier.
> But in fact it becomes available as both an identifier and as the
> built-in.
>
> This is what I tested:
>
> template<typename T, bool IsPtr = __is_pointer(T)>
> struct __is_pointer
> {
> enum { value = IsPtr };
> };
> static_assert( __is_pointer<int*>::value, "" );
>
> template<typename T>
> struct is_pointer
> {
> static constexpr bool value = __is_pointer(T);
> };
> static_assert( is_pointer<int*>::value, "" );
>
> So the is_pointer template can still use the built-in even though the
> name '__is_pointer' has been declared as an identifier.
>
> So Clang matches GCC and it works fine. Good!
Thank you!
>
> >+ {
> >+ enum { __value = _IsPtr };
> >+ };
> >+#else
> > template<typename _Tp>
> > struct __is_pointer
> > {
> >@@ -377,6 +384,28 @@ __INT_N(__GLIBCXX_TYPE_INT_N_3)
> > typedef __true_type __type;
> > };
> >
> >+ template<typename _Tp>
> >+ struct __is_pointer<_Tp* const>
>
> None of the other traits in bits/cpp_type_traits.h is true for
> cv-qualified types, so these partial specializations make __is_pointer
> the odd one out. Are they necessary?
It looks like we don't need these specializations. I'll remove these.
>
> >+ {
> >+ enum { __value = 1 };
> >+ typedef __true_type __type;
> >+ };
> >+
> >+ template<typename _Tp>
> >+ struct __is_pointer<_Tp* volatile>
> >+ {
> >+ enum { __value = 1 };
> >+ typedef __true_type __type;
> >+ };
> >+
> >+ template<typename _Tp>
> >+ struct __is_pointer<_Tp* const volatile>
> >+ {
> >+ enum { __value = 1 };
> >+ typedef __true_type __type;
> >+ };
> >+#endif
> >+
> > //
> > // An arithmetic type is an integer type or a floating point type
> > //
> >@@ -387,7 +416,7 @@ __INT_N(__GLIBCXX_TYPE_INT_N_3)
> >
> > //
> > // A scalar type is an arithmetic type or a pointer type
> >- //
> >+ //
> > template<typename _Tp>
> > struct __is_scalar
> > : public __traitor<__is_arithmetic<_Tp>, __is_pointer<_Tp> >
> >diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> >b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> >index 748fa186881..ea013b4b7bc 100644
> >--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> >+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> >@@ -542,19 +542,33 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> > : public true_type { };
> > #endif
> >
> >- template<typename>
> >- struct __is_pointer_helper
> >+ /// is_pointer
> >+#if _GLIBCXX_USE_BUILTIN_TRAIT(__is_pointer)
> >+ template<typename _Tp>
> >+ struct is_pointer
> >+ : public __bool_constant<__is_pointer(_Tp)>
> >+ { };
> >+#else
> >+ template<typename _Tp>
> >+ struct is_pointer
> > : public false_type { };
> >
> > template<typename _Tp>
> >- struct __is_pointer_helper<_Tp*>
> >+ struct is_pointer<_Tp*>
> > : public true_type { };
> >
> >- /// is_pointer
> > template<typename _Tp>
> >- struct is_pointer
> >- : public __is_pointer_helper<__remove_cv_t<_Tp>>::type
> >- { };
> >+ struct is_pointer<_Tp* const>
> >+ : public true_type { };
> >+
> >+ template<typename _Tp>
> >+ struct is_pointer<_Tp* volatile>
> >+ : public true_type { };
> >+
> >+ template<typename _Tp>
> >+ struct is_pointer<_Tp* const volatile>
> >+ : public true_type { };
> >+#endif
> >
> > /// is_lvalue_reference
> > template<typename>
> >@@ -3268,8 +3282,22 @@ template <typename _Tp, size_t _Num>
> > inline constexpr bool is_array_v<_Tp[_Num]> = true;
> > #endif
> >
> >+#if _GLIBCXX_USE_BUILTIN_TRAIT(__is_pointer)
> >+template <typename _Tp>
> >+ inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v = __is_pointer(_Tp);
> >+#else
> > template <typename _Tp>
> >- inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v = is_pointer<_Tp>::value;
> >+ inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v = false;
> >+template <typename _Tp>
> >+ inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v<_Tp*> = true;
> >+template <typename _Tp>
> >+ inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v<_Tp* const> = true;
> >+template <typename _Tp>
> >+ inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v<_Tp* volatile> = true;
> >+template <typename _Tp>
> >+ inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v<_Tp* const volatile> = true;
> >+#endif
> >+
> > template <typename _Tp>
> > inline constexpr bool is_lvalue_reference_v = false;
> > template <typename _Tp>
> >--
> >2.44.0
> >
>
