On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:15 PM Hongyu Wang <wwwhhhyyy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> 于2024年5月16日周四 15:05写道:
>
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 8:25 AM Hongyu Wang <hongyu.w...@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In ix86_override_options_after_change, calls to ix86_default_align
> > > and ix86_recompute_optlev_based_flags will cause mismatched target
> > > opt_set when doing cl_optimization_restore. Move them back to
> > > ix86_option_override_internal to solve the issue.
> > >
> > > Bootstrapped & regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, and Rainer helped to
> > > test with i386-pc-solaris2.11 which also passed 32/64bit tests.
> >
> > Since this is a tricky area apparently without too much test coverage can
> > we have a testcase for this?
>
> This is a fix for my previous change on PR 107692, which moved these 2
> functions to ix86_override_options_after_change and it caused the
> PR113719 regression. The PR103696 test is the one that expose the
> issue. Actually the previous change will cause these 2 function be
> called in cl_optimization_restore
> which is redundant and incorrect. I cannot find another test to expose
> other functional regressions.
>
> >
> > > Ok for trunk and backport down to gcc12?
Ok.
> > >
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         PR target/113719
> > >         * config/i386/i386-options.cc 
> > > (ix86_override_options_after_change):
> > >         Remove call to ix86_default_align and
> > >         ix86_recompute_optlev_based_flags.
> > >         (ix86_option_override_internal): Call ix86_default_align and
> > >         ix86_recompute_optlev_based_flags.
> > > ---
> > >  gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc | 10 +++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc 
> > > b/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc
> > > index ac48b5c61c4..d97464f2c74 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc
> > > @@ -1930,11 +1930,6 @@ ix86_recompute_optlev_based_flags (struct 
> > > gcc_options *opts,
> > >  void
> > >  ix86_override_options_after_change (void)
> > >  {
> > > -  /* Default align_* from the processor table.  */
> > > -  ix86_default_align (&global_options);
> > > -
> > > -  ix86_recompute_optlev_based_flags (&global_options, 
> > > &global_options_set);
> > > -
> > >    /* Disable unrolling small loops when there's explicit
> > >       -f{,no}unroll-loop.  */
> > >    if ((OPTION_SET_P (flag_unroll_loops))
> > > @@ -2530,6 +2525,8 @@ ix86_option_override_internal (bool main_args_p,
> > >
> > >    set_ix86_tune_features (opts, ix86_tune, opts->x_ix86_dump_tunes);
> > >
> > > +  ix86_recompute_optlev_based_flags (opts, opts_set);
> > > +
> > >    ix86_override_options_after_change ();
> > >
> > >    ix86_tune_cost = processor_cost_table[ix86_tune];
> > > @@ -2565,6 +2562,9 @@ ix86_option_override_internal (bool main_args_p,
> > >        || TARGET_64BIT_P (opts->x_ix86_isa_flags))
> > >      opts->x_ix86_regparm = REGPARM_MAX;
> > >
> > > +  /* Default align_* from the processor table.  */
> > > +  ix86_default_align (&global_options);
> > > +
> > >    /* Provide default for -mbranch-cost= value.  */
> > >    SET_OPTION_IF_UNSET (opts, opts_set, ix86_branch_cost,
> > >                        ix86_tune_cost->branch_cost);
> > > --
> > > 2.31.1
> > >



-- 
BR,
Hongtao

Reply via email to