On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 at 22:30, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I've run aspell on gcc.pot (just quickly skimming, so pressing
> I key hundreds of times and just stopping when I catch something that
> looks like a misspelling).
>
> I plan to commit this tomorrow as obvious unless somebody finds some
> issues in it, you know, I'm not a native English speaker.
> Yes, I know favour is valid UK spelling, but we spell the US way I think.

Yup:
https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#Spelling

> I've left some *ise* -> *ize* cases (recognise, initialise), those
> had too many hits, though in translatable strings just 4, so maybe
> worth changing too:
> msgid "recognise the specified suffix as a definition module filename"
> msgid "recognise the specified suffix as implementation and module filenames"
> "initialiser for a dylib."
> msgid "%qE attribute argument %qE is not recognised"

That spelling is explicitly mentioned at the link above, so they
should be "ize" really.

> 2024-04-22  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
>
>         * config/epiphany/epiphany.opt (may-round-for-trunc): Spelling fix:
>         floatig -> floating.
>         * config/riscv/riscv.opt (mcsr-check): Spelling fix: CRS -> CSR.
>         * params.opt (-param=ipa-cp-profile-count-base=): Spelling fix:
>         frequncy -> frequency.
> gcc/c-family/
>         * c.opt (Wstrict-flex-arrays): Spelling fix: inproper -> improper.
> gcc/cp/
>         * parser.cc (cp_parser_using_declaration): Spelling fix: favour
>         -> favor.
> gcc/m2/
>         * lang.opt (fuse-list=): Spelling fix: finalializations ->
>         finalizations.

LGTM

+Reviewed-by: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>

Reply via email to