Hello Ian,
when I add in gcc/go/config-lang.in the line
boot_language=yes
then on stage3 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libbacktrace is compiled before
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo and this error is gone.
But then Makefile.def has
target_modules = { module= libatomic; bootstrap=true; lib_path=.libs; };
and in x86_64-pc-linux-gnu libatomic is not compiled before
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo . Linking the latter fails
make[2]: Entering directory '/git/gcc/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo'
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link /git/gcc/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/git/gcc/build/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ …long text…
golang.org/x/sys/cpu_gccgo_x86.lo ../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la
../libatomic/libatomic_convenience.la ../libffi/libffi_convenience.la -lpthread
-lm
./libtool: line 5195: cd: ../libatomic/.libs: No such file or directory
libtool: link: cannot determine absolute directory name of `../libatomic/.libs'
So either lib_path=.libs interferes (when gcc/go/config-lang.in contains
“boot_language=yes”), I have made the semi-serial build, trying to save a lot
of time waiting to get on stage3, somehow wrong, or libatomic must be mentioned
in gcc/go/config-lang.in . I have the feeling that ./configure
--enable-langugage=all works, because gcc/d/config-lang.in contains
boot_language=yes, and then in some way libphobos or d depend on libatomic.
That said bootstrap=true might only be relevant when boot_langugages=yes is
present.
In addition gcc/go/config-lang.in:boot_language=yes implies that on stage2
(thus in prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/) libbacktrace is built, which I do not want
this, as libbacktrace is needed only by libgo on stage3.
Can someone explain, why is libbacktrace built once in the built-root, as
stage1-libbacktrace, prev-libbacktrace and libbacktrace (for stage3) and once
again in stage1-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libbacktrace,
prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libbacktrace/ and in x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libbacktrace
? My precise question is why libbacktrace is built once in the build-root
directory and once in the x86_64-pc-linux-gnu directory?
Kind regards Дилян
Am 26. März 2024 16:37:40 UTC schrieb Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]>:
>On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 9:33 AM Дилян Палаузов
><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Makefile.def contains already:
>>
>> host_modules= { module= libbacktrace; bootstrap=true; }; // since eff02e4f84
>> - "libbacktrace/: * Initial implementation" year 2012
>>
>> host_modules= { module= libcpp; bootstrap=true; }; // since 4f4e53dd8517c0b2
>> - year 2004
>
>Yes. I was just trying to answer your question.
>
>Ian
>
>> Am 25. März 2024 23:59:52 UTC schrieb Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 4:32 AM Дилян Палаузов
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can the build experts say what needs to be changed? The dependencies I
>>>> added are missing in the build configuration (@if gcc-bootstrap).
>>>>
>>>> I cannot say if libbacktrace should or should not be a bootstrap=true
>>>> module.
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't count as a build expert these days, but since GCC itself links
>>> against libbacktrace, my understanding is that the libbacktrace
>>> host_module should be bootstrap=true, just like, say, libcpp.
>>>
>>> Ian
