Hi, on 2024/3/16 04:34, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 3/6/24 3:27 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote: >> on 2024/3/4 02:55, jeevitha wrote: >>> The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on >>> powerpc64le-linux. >>> >>> When we expand the __builtin_vsx_splat_2di function, we were allowing >>> immediate >>> value for second operand which causes an unrecognizable insn ICE. Even >>> though >>> the immediate value was forced into a register, it wasn't correctly assigned >>> to the second operand. So corrected the assignment of op1 to operands[1]. > [snip] >> As the discussions in the thread of the previous versions, I think >> Segher agreed this approach, so OK for trunk with the above nits >> tweaked, thanks! > > The bogus vsx_splat_<mode> code goes all the way back to GCC 8, so we > should backport this fix. Segher and Ke Wen, can we get an approval > to backport this to all the open release branches (GCC 13, 12, 11)? > Thanks.
Sure, okay for backporting this to all active branches, thanks! > > Jeevitha, once we get approval, please perform the backports. > > Peter > > BR, Kewen
