On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 08:38:18PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:24:11PM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote: > > Sadly, I must admit this is looking like GCC 15 material. > > If deferred for GCC 15, can't we at least do some minimal > change and just guard the member pedwarn with cxx_dialect < something?
I could do something like that, but... > Given that -Wextra-semi isn't on by default nor included in > -Wall -W, I think even accepting this for GCC 14 wouldn't be that > risky. ...I also don't think it's that risky but technically, it's not a regression I think. > Jason's decision. > > + /* If -Wextra-semi wasn't specified, warn only when -pedantic is in > > > + effect in C++11 and below. DR 1693 added "empty-declaration" to the > > > + syntax for "member-declaration". */ > > > + else if (pedantic && cxx_dialect < cxx14) > > > > If it was a DR, did it apply just to C++14 or changed C++11 as well? It's got Status: C++14 so I thought that C++11/C++98 had not been adjusted. Marek
