On Mon, Feb 12 2024, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Believe it or not, even though I have re-worked the internals of the
>> lattices completely, the array itself is older than my involvement with
>> GCC (or at least with ipa-cp.c ;-).
>> 
>> So it being an array and not a vector is historical coincidence, as far
>> as I am concerned :-).  But that may be the reason, or because vector
>> macros at that time looked scary, or perhaps the initialization by
>> XCNEWVEC zeroing everything out was considered attractive (I kind of
>> like that but constructors would probably be cleaner), I don't know.
>
> If your class is no longer a POD, then the clearing before construcion
> is dead and GCC may optimize it out.  So fixing this may solve some
> surprised in foreseable future when we will try to compile older GCC's
> with newer ones.
>

That's a good point.  I'll prepare a patch converting the whole thing to
use constructors and vectors.

Thanks,

Martin

Reply via email to