Il 06/02/24 10:17, Jonathan Yong ha scritto:
On 2/6/24 05:31, NightStrike wrote:
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024, 06:53 Matteo Italia <mat...@mitalia.net> wrote:
Il 31/01/24 04:24, LIU Hao ha scritto:
在 2024-01-31 08:08, Jonathan Yong 写道:
On 1/24/24 15:17, Matteo Italia wrote:
Ping! That's a one-line fix, and you can find all the details in the
bugzilla entry. Also, I can provide executables built with the
affected toolchains, demonstrating the problem and the fix.
Thanks,
Matteo
I was away last week. LH, care to comment? Changes look fine to me.
The change looks good to me, too.
I haven't tested it though. According to a similar construction around
'libgcc/unwind.inc:265' it should be that way.
Hello,
thank you for the replies, is there anything else I can do to help push
this forward?
Remember to mention the pr with the right syntax in the ChangeLog so the
bot adds a comment field. I didn't see it in yours, but I might have
missed
it.
Thanks all, pushed to master branch.
Thanks all :-) do you think this warrants backports? On one hand this is
a pretty niche feature, and I am probably the first to notice the
problem in ~12 years since that code was written, OTOH Win64/SEH was not
super widespread for a long time, and seems like a safe enough change.
Also: should I explicitly mark PR113337 as resolved? The bot added the
reference to the commit, but the PR is still marked as "UNCONFIRMED".
