Hi!
When looking into PR113572, I've noticed a typo in VECTOR_CST documentation
and grep found pasto of it elsewhere.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk
as obvious.
2024-01-25 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
* doc/generic.texi (VECTOR_CST): Fix typo - petterns -> patterns.
* doc/rtl.texi (CONST_VECTOR): Likewise.
--- gcc/doc/generic.texi.jj 2024-01-03 12:07:05.393689002 +0100
+++ gcc/doc/generic.texi 2024-01-24 20:40:29.430727745 +0100
@@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ vector. For example @{ 0, 1 @} could be
one element each or one pattern with two elements (@var{base0} and
@var{base1}). The canonical encoding is always the one with the
fewest patterns or (if both encodings have the same number of
-petterns) the one with the fewest encoded elements.
+patterns) the one with the fewest encoded elements.
@samp{vector_cst_encoding_nelts (@var{v})} gives the total number of
encoded elements in @var{v}, which is 6 in the example above.
--- gcc/doc/rtl.texi.jj 2024-01-03 12:07:04.050707817 +0100
+++ gcc/doc/rtl.texi 2024-01-24 20:41:00.326299026 +0100
@@ -1843,7 +1843,7 @@ vector. For example @{ 0, 1 @} could be
one element each or one pattern with two elements (@var{base0} and
@var{base1}). The canonical encoding is always the one with the
fewest patterns or (if both encodings have the same number of
-petterns) the one with the fewest encoded elements.
+patterns) the one with the fewest encoded elements.
@samp{const_vector_encoding_nelts (@var{v})} gives the total number of
encoded elements in @var{v}, which is 6 in the example above.
Jakub
