On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> These symbols were exported at an incorrect symbol version,
> the following patch fixes that.
>
> I believe we should also rename the symbols (__nested_func_ptr_*
> or __gcc_nested_func_ptr_* or similar), __builtin_ in the name
> doesn't look right, but that will need more changes to make it
> work.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK, but maybe squash with the renaming.
> 2024-01-16 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
>
> PR libgcc/113402
> * libgcc-std.ver.in (GCC_7.0.0): Move
> __builtin_nested_func_ptr_created and
> __builtin_nested_func_ptr_deleted from this symbol version to ...
> (GCC_14.0.0): ... this one.
>
> --- libgcc/libgcc-std.ver.in.jj 2024-01-03 12:07:29.751347757 +0100
> +++ libgcc/libgcc-std.ver.in 2024-01-15 17:55:16.064728452 +0100
> @@ -1943,9 +1943,6 @@ GCC_4.8.0 {
> GCC_7.0.0 {
> __PFX__divmoddi4
> __PFX__divmodti4
> -
> - __builtin_nested_func_ptr_created
> - __builtin_nested_func_ptr_deleted
> }
>
> %inherit GCC_14.0.0 GCC_7.0.0
> @@ -1960,4 +1957,6 @@ GCC_14.0.0 {
> __PFX__strub_enter
> __PFX__strub_update
> __PFX__strub_leave
> + __builtin_nested_func_ptr_created
> + __builtin_nested_func_ptr_deleted
> }
>
> Jakub
>
>
