Hello Richard. Thank you for your suggestion. I am sending a patch update according to it.
> How about avoiding the clash by using the names HIDDEN, SYMBOL_TYPE and > SYMBOL_SIZE, with SYMBOL_TYPE taking the symbol type as argument? Yes, unless the symbol is explicitly exported using `__declspec(dllexport)`, it will be effectively hidden. > What's the practical effect of not marking the symbols as hidden on > mingw32? Will they still be local to the DLL/EXE, since they haven't >been explicitly exported? (Sorry for the probably dumb question.) Best regards, Radek BartoĊ
v4-0001-Ifdef-.hidden-.type-and-.size-pseudo-ops-for-aarc.patch
Description: v4-0001-Ifdef-.hidden-.type-and-.size-pseudo-ops-for-aarc.patch
