On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 10:19 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > On Mon, 2023-12-11 at 19:20 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote: > > I'm not sure how to do this. I tried the following commands, but > > this > > fails even on master: > > > > ../../gcc/configure --enable-host-shared --enable- > > languages=c,jit,c++,fortran,objc,lto --enable-checking=release -- > > disable-werror --prefix=/opt/gcc > > > > make bootstrap -j24 > > make -k check -j24 > > > > From what I can understand, the unexpected failures are in g++: > > > > === g++ Summary === > > > > # of expected passes 72790 > > # of unexpected failures 1 > > # of expected failures 1011 > > # of unsupported tests 3503 > > > > === g++ Summary === > > > > # of expected passes 4750 > > # of unexpected failures 27 > > # of expected failures 16 > > # of unsupported tests 43 > > > > > > Am I doing something wrong? > > I normally do a pair of bootstrap/tests: a "control" build with a > pristine copy of the source tree, and an "experiment" build > containing > the patch(s) of interest, then compare the results. FWIW given that > each one takes 2 hours on my machine, I normally just do one control > build on a Monday, rebase all my working copies to that revision, and > then use that control build throughout the week for comparison when > testing patches. > > I can have a go at testing an updated patch if you like; presumably > the > latest version is this one: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/638841.html > right?
Thanks. I would appreciate if you do it. Yes, this is the latest patch. > > Dave > > > > > > > On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 12:49 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > > > On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 17:13 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote: > > > > Here's the updated patch. > > > > The failure was due to the test being in the test array while > > > > it > > > > should > > > > not have been there since it changes the context. > > > > > > Thanks for the updated patch. > > > > > > Did you do a full bootstrap and regression test with this one, or > > > do > > > you want me to? > > > > > > Dave > > > > > >