Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> writes: >>> + >>> +/* Initialization of the ext-dce pass. Primarily this means >>> + setting up the various bitmaps we utilize. */ >>> + >>> +static void >>> +ext_dce_init (void) >>> +{ >>> + >> >> Nit: excess blank line. > Various nits have been fixed. I think those are all mine. For reasons > I don't understand to this day, my brain thinks there should be vertical > whitespace between the function comment and the definition. I'm > constantly having to fix that.
Yeah, I've never known whether a blank line is preferred between the comment and function definition. When I started (obviously somewhat later than you :)), "yes" seemed to be much more common, but now it's pretty mixed. So I just do what surrounding code does. (Personally I slightly prefer the blank line.) So I wasn't commenting on that part, although reading it back, I can see how it looked like that. It was just on the blank line immediately above, after the opening "{". I.e. there were some instances of: void f (void) { ...foo...; } rather than: void f (void) { ...foo...; } Thanks, Richard