> Am 22.12.2023 um 09:26 schrieb Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Large/huge _BitInt types are returned in memory and the bitint lowering
> pass right now relies on that.
> The gimplification etc. use aggregate_value_p to see if it should be
> returned in memory or not and use
>  <retval> = _123;
>  return <retval>;
> rather than
>  return _123;
> But expand_thunk used e.g. by IPA-ICF was performing an optimization,
> assuming is_gimple_reg_type is always passed in registers and not calling
> aggregate_value_p in that case.  The following patch changes it to match
> what the gimplification etc. are doing.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

Ok

Richard 

> 2023-12-22  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>    PR tree-optimization/112941
>    * symtab-thunks.cc (expand_thunk): Check aggregate_value_p regardless
>    of whether is_gimple_reg_type (restype) or not.
> 
>    * gcc.dg/bitint-60.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/symtab-thunks.cc.jj    2023-08-24 15:37:28.698418172 +0200
> +++ gcc/symtab-thunks.cc    2023-12-21 16:42:41.406127267 +0100
> @@ -479,21 +479,15 @@ expand_thunk (cgraph_node *node, bool ou
>                 resdecl,
>                 build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (resdecl), 0));
>        }
> -      else if (!is_gimple_reg_type (restype))
> +      else if (aggregate_value_p (resdecl, TREE_TYPE (thunk_fndecl)))
>        {
> -          if (aggregate_value_p (resdecl, TREE_TYPE (thunk_fndecl)))
> -        {
> -          restmp = resdecl;
> +          restmp = resdecl;
> 
> -          if (VAR_P (restmp))
> -            {
> -              add_local_decl (cfun, restmp);
> -              BLOCK_VARS (DECL_INITIAL (current_function_decl))
> -            = restmp;
> -            }
> +          if (VAR_P (restmp))
> +        {
> +          add_local_decl (cfun, restmp);
> +          BLOCK_VARS (DECL_INITIAL (current_function_decl)) = restmp;
>        }
> -          else
> -        restmp = create_tmp_var (restype, "retval");
>        }
>      else
>        restmp = create_tmp_reg (restype, "retval");
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-60.c.jj    2023-12-21 16:49:41.289298560 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-60.c    2023-12-21 16:49:09.061746003 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/112941 */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target bitint575 } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c23" } */
> +
> +unsigned _BitInt(495) f1 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y = 
> x; return y; }
> +unsigned _BitInt(495) f2 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y 
> = x; return y; }
> +unsigned _BitInt(495) f3 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { _BitInt(539) y = x; 
> return y; }
> +unsigned _BitInt(495) f4 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { _BitInt(539) y = x; 
> return y; }
> +_BitInt(495) f5 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y = x; 
> return y; }
> +_BitInt(495) f6 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y = x; 
> return y; }
> +_BitInt(495) f7 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { _BitInt(539) y = x; return y; }
> +_BitInt(495) f8 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { _BitInt(539) y = x; return y; }
> +unsigned _BitInt(495) f9 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { return (unsigned 
> _BitInt(539)) x; }
> +unsigned _BitInt(495) f10 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { return (unsigned 
> _BitInt(539)) x; }
> +unsigned _BitInt(495) f11 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { return (_BitInt(539)) x; 
> }
> +unsigned _BitInt(495) f12 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { return (_BitInt(539)) 
> x; }
> +_BitInt(495) f13 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { return (unsigned _BitInt(539)) x; 
> }
> +_BitInt(495) f14 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { return (unsigned _BitInt(539)) 
> x; }
> +_BitInt(495) f15 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { return (_BitInt(539)) x; }
> +_BitInt(495) f16 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { return (_BitInt(539)) x; }
> 
>    Jakub
> 

Reply via email to